20090228

various critters

http://www.richard-seaman.com/Travel/Malaysia/Wildlife/index.html

The above is quite interesting!! I found this page shortly after I
ran across a picture in my "other people's pictures" collection in
iPhoto. It looked like a trilobyte, but was so realistic that my eye
caught it and I thought, "What the... that looked like a realy
picture!" So I looked more closely and it was named
"firefly_thai_2.jpg." I thought, "Firefly larvae perhaps?" Sure
enough... anywho, in looking for it, I saw all sorts of cool
creatures, including the moth with the fungus on it. (http://www.richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper/Nature/Fungus/MalayMothEater.jpg
is the picture I mean.)

Just thought I'd share!!


~nv

Man vs Woman

Once again I am both outraged and bewildered that the battle of the
sexes ensues.

I was reading this wordpress.com column, "One French Woman's Opinion,"
and realized that yes, these things are still being talked about and
it's all still quite mixed up.

http://whatisyourownopinion.wordpress.com/category/love/ is the
website in case anyone here is interested.

Anywho, this is how I chose to marry, and how I choose to stay married:

1. Preconceived notions. I had serious doubts that I'd ever marry.
I was raised fiercely independent of men. I grew up without a
father. I was very dependent on Mother and she was dependent on me.
We had each other for support in the cold harsh reality we called
life. So I saw marriage as something only "delusional" people had.
They weren't being truthful with themselves and simply following
society's rules. To me, marriage was completely unnecessary. If you
actually met someone you really liked and got along with, you chose to
be with someone forever, and you simply did it. You didn't have to
marry to prove that to everyone.

2. Engagement. In walked Dale. It's funny, how suddenly my opinions
about the matter changed once I found out how capable of love I was
(am). Suddenly I wanted to shout it out to the whole world. One day
I told him that if he ever asked me "that question" I'd probably say
yes, but I didn't expect him to or anything, I just wanted to make
sure he wasn't too scared to ask if he was so inclined. Months later
that day came. I was stunned but I did say yes! He knew me well
enough, too, than to go about it story-book style: Instead of a
diamond ring, I received a blue plastic one made on a machine I was
most interested in hearing more about. He thought he needed to give
me a gift, too, though, so he gave me a computer that I'd been lusting
after and saving for.

3. The wedding. We did not believe in spending a lot of money on a
wedding because it was only one day and both of us preferred to spend
money on gadgets instead, and save for our trip across the country.
So we walked up a mountain in our new home town with a JP and two
relatives. I dressed myself in purple with a few green accents and a
silver circlet. The whole thing cost me under $120. (Although I will
admit that the dress I purchased originally for the occasion was $400
- it did not show up in time so now I use it for Halloween and
Renfaires. Why waste a good Medieval outfit?)

4. The honeymoon. People are telling me it's not quite over yet. We
did not have a honeymoon per se, but we call our trip out west just
that because it was three months after we were married and the only
major, special thing we really did (aside from getting married). We'd
been talking about it for a while before the question was popped,
though.

5. How do we get along? I think we get along pretty darned well.
Growing up, I heard a lot of neighbours yelling at each other. I
didn't want to be like that, and that's one reason I didn't want to
get married for so long. But Dale respects me, listens, offers good
advice, has good ideas, and is receptive to my needs. Further, he's
excited about life and all it has to offer. His bad moods are hardly
that; he just wanders off by himself and releases it quietly,
occasionally asking if he can vent to me about whatever it is. Then
it's over. I know my own moods shift like waves in the sea and it
amazes me that he doesn't take it personally most of the time. The
key component here, though, is that we listen to each other and
respect one another. I can't stress how important sensitivity,
understanding, and communication are to our relationship. And, not
everything is based on what each of us wants. Typically, if he wants
to go here and I want to go there and we're both going to xyz, we look
at it logically to decide whether we go his way or my way. Which is
closer? Which makes a more complete circuit for our itinerary? What
is the timing of both? Can we do both or only one? Who else might be
involved? I distinctly remember the first time this method of
decision-making became obvious in our relationship. We wanted to go
to about five or six places and it was agreed upon in advance. We
were preparing to leave and Dale says, "I know we said we'd go here,
but... I wondered if we could go here first, then here. The reason
is ... xyz ... it's fine if you don't want to, I know you really
wanted to do THIS first. It's just that if we do /this/ first then I
might miss out on /this/." I said, "Well, yeah, I do want to do my
thing first, but... let's think about this. Your thing is here on the
map, mine is here. The rest are here, here, here, and here. So if we
did my thing, really, it's out of the way, whereas your thing is over
here... Yeah, it makes logical sense anyway. I say we do it your
way." So we try to implement that now. The idea is to set aside your
desires and look at it in black and white. Make it the most efficient
you can, and know that you both want to do this, and accept that you
won't get to do what you want all the time. Now, it's not to say that
it always works this way, but having established this early on, I
think, has helped us stick with it. One day I proposed something that
Dale really didn't want to do, but it logically fit into our plan. By
his tone I knew he was rather peeved about it, but I knew I'd given up
things I wanted to do out of logic, and my thing was, this time,
logical. So I didn't get upset, I simply stated fact and then backed
away, saying that if he really disliked the idea, then we didn't have
to do it, but that it was logical and something I very much wanted to
do. He ventured off for a quarter of an hour and finally came back
saying no, he was OK with it. Other times, we simply went our
separate ways. I guess what I'm trying to say is that the logical
approach is extremely helpful to us, but in the end, our consideration
for each other is what keeps our relationship so awesome.

Perhaps it's the combination of an engineer geek with a computer
geek? I don't know. But instead of bickering, it seems far more
productive to create solutions to potential disagreements before they
turn into unnecessary arguments for the neighbours to hear. We're
just happy we have someone to do these things with, and that we can
afford to do things. Not everyone can say that. Why ruin it?

In summary, I don't get why there's a battle of the sexes. Yes, there
are physical differences, both out in the open and inside. But in
this world of equality concerns, I hope these battles fade - and
fast. That folks still have notions of ownership, manipulation,
revenge, jealousy, and resentment is utterly flabbergasting. To each
their own, man, but egads... how do some of you live like that?

~nv

20090222

shazam!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dale's iPhone has this program on it now called Shazam where you point
the mic toward the sound of a song playing somewheres and it'll tell
you what the song is. I figured it would only work for really obvious
things that are pretty popular these days, but NO!! First we tried
Barenaked Ladies, then Vienna Teng, then ... yes, you guessed it,
Peter Cetera. Now, this is not to say I think Peter's not popular
these days - in fact, I tried a very low-key version of City Hall by
Vienna Teng to really test it and was floored it got her so easily.
The reason it's amazing that it got Peter is because I tried the most
obscure song I could think of by him. Scheherazade. And! I used the
very BEGINNING of the song, with the schwoooOOOOOO synths at the
beginning (sorry for the sound effects, I honestly can't think of how
else to describe those things). So there was VERY little to go on
there. Apparently it's not as obscure as I thought. It caught it
anyway and even displayed a link to a YouTube video. Which I knew
shouldn't exist because there WAS no video made for this song (should
have been but wasn't done). Turns out someone else likes the song
besides me. Someone put an image of the album cover up and played the
song in the background. I think I'd have gotten more creative and
added actual video, but, hey, whatever.

SHAZAM!!

~nv

20090215

Harris Hill Ski Jump

Dale's mom and we went to the Harris Hill Ski Jump in Brattleboro, VT yesterday.  It just opened again after some good number of years and many significant renovations, and jumpers from all over came to compete.  There were folks from Austria, Slovenia, and EVEN COLORADO!!  Whoo!  (I'm being funny there.)  Well, of course we took over 300 photos and of those 300, a few of them were OK.  We apparently shot many of these from off-limits areas, however:  The side we were on was a photographer's dream, so few people; all of them had cameras.  Then someone asked if we were press, and kindly threw us out.  Apparently the few other cameras along "our" side of the jump were press, not spectators.  Whups!  Thanks to Dale's mom for the potty break... otherwise the guy may not have noticed!  LOL

Anywho, a few shots from yesterday can be had at www.mount9.com, but here's my favourite.  The reason I like it is because the picture itself isn't particularly focused, and most of it is so light compared to the left corner.  So my eyes are immediately drawn to that corner where the figure is looking down.  It's really not the greatest shot, especially considering that I meant to blur the people down below far more than they were, but I still like it.  And yes, the angle was intentional.  I got something right!  By the way, it is VERY hard to focus on people at close range going 50mph+.  Just for the record.

20090209

Vienna Teng

Vienna Teng. I first witnessed her voice several years ago when she
was on the David Letterman show. I still remember it fairly vividly:
I was sitting on my couch with my laptop, chatting with online
friends. My friend, Dave, comes online and suddenly writes, "CBS.
Letterman. NOW." It took me a moment to realize he meant TV, but I
found the remote, turned on the set, and froze dead in my tracks as
goosebumps rose all over my body. A slight shadow of a thing, Vienna
filled the screen with her elegance. She swayed gracefully as her
fingers danced lightly, but firmly, over the lovely ebonies and
ivories of a baby grand. She was singing "Gravity," which immediately
rendered itself a staple in my musical diet from that moment on.
Letterman, I think, was one of her first big breaks. She's still not
really "out there" that I know of, but she has gained a good share of
popularity and does lovely shows to eager audiences all over the
nation and even in other countries.

She's Chinese-American, and has sung at least one song entirely in
Chinese in fact - Green Island Serenade. (How I yearn to memorize
that one so I can "sing" along in my truck!) She started playing
piano at age five and began composing her own melodies around age
six... although she's said that she only plays her own compositions
from high school onward (at least publicly). She's sort of a cross
between pop and lounge music - i.e., kind of folksie/jazzy with a
touch of pop. I say lounge because of songs like Transcontinental,
1:30AM, in particular, but simply listening to her, one is easily able
to picture her singing to a small cozy group of evening patrons. As I
listen to her, I often imagine myself in a 50's or 60's bar room,
dimly lit, smokey air, blue spotlights... I'm looking over a sparkling
glass of glowing amber-green liquor, ruminating as I watch a poised,
white-gloved woman on stage singing along to an upright bass and a
soft tappity-tap of a snare. She's eyeing her following with a
seductively appraising look as she sings, lowering her eyelashes to
accentuate the effect she has on the gents. She uses her mike as a
vocal weapon. We are all shushed into silence by the power of her
voice. She smiles as she raises an eyebrow. A sparkle glints beneath
her lashes and she singers louder, stronger...

Yet, whenever I've seen Vienna on stage, she always looks very caught
up in her own singing. It's like she's scarcely aware of the eyes
upon her despite the roaming glance of the performer within.

I firmly believe that everyone has their own talents and that some are
just harder to see than others, but in her case, the talent is pretty
obvious. I'm quite spellbound by her, in fact. My lifelong love of
Peter Cetera's voice and the little emotional bursts he'd tuck in
there will always have my heart, but the lyrics were somehow never
quite so poignant as Richard Marx's husky insights, Vienna's lulling
truths, Eminem's harsh frankness or Amy Lee's wonderfully expressive
pain. Some folks just KNOW how to vocalize their hearts out and
thankfully for us, permit us to enjoy it while they do so. I savour
these hypnotizing tidbits for the expressive masterpieces that they are.

Here's my reaction to one of Vienna's many irresistible songs. I used
to write these "reviews" a lot while listening to Peter Cetera's
music, and now it's Vienna's turn to suffer my literary attentions. I
hope she doesn't mind. LOL.

PASSAGE
Vienna begins completely solo, soon accompanied by a crickety sound of
background noise, ever so slight. She sings of having died in a car
crash, and how her loved ones are coping. My heart is immediately
spellbound by the capturing lull of her eloquently descriptive
lyrics. I can see the wreckage of ironic innocence; the other driver
walking sadly (but gratefully!) away with his wife; the sister
screaming, tears in eyes; the lover looking on in silence; the
mother's pain; the coworkers staring into space in a moment of
silence. The story continues as her loved ones cope with her death.
They move through life, accepting, moving forward, remembering, and
eventually decades pass. The irony of her death now so unlikely due
to current safety designs, the song ends with her lover, who
eventually moved on with his own life and married to someone more than
a beloved memory. The lyrics are poignantly realistic. Vienna's
compelling vocals draw you out of your emotional shell despite any
resistance you may have. They tantalize your ears with sweet anguish
and beat you with their raw detail so undeterringly that the true
irony of a song about an automobile accident is this: If you're
driving, DO NOT under any circumstances listen to this song. For if
you have any shred of emotional turbulence within you, you will have
trouble seeing the road as the depth of these lyrics reach beneath
your surface and yank on your insides until your eyes blur with tears.

Visually spellbounding through the lulling pull of a delicately strong
vocal supremacy. That's Vienna, in my book.

~nv

20090208

Screw it

I can't justify spending hours downloading patches just to try a game.

WoW is officially on my sh** list.

World of Warcraft Woes

Okay, so I finally decided to install and try out World of Warcraft.

The install went fine. Then I had to create an account and register
for the free 10-day version. (I had the install disc but the 14-day
trial code was already taken.) Then I spent the rest of the evening
downloading patches. I left the last three to download overnight (one
was 2.3GB - yes, GB) and thought, "Yay, tomorrow morning I'll get to
play the game, FINALLY!!"

Ha.

I got up a few minutes ago and rushed downstairs only to find that I
had run out of hard drive space and the last patch won't download. I
have 5GB!! I have a slight problem with this.

1. The original system requirements state that you need 10GB of hard
drive space. Since WoW is currently taking up 8GB with the gazillion
patches it already downloaded, it stands to reason that 5GB more
should be plenty.

2. One should NOT have to spend inordinate amounts of time downloading
patches just to play a goddamned game. Get it right the first time,
people, and put it on the DVD.

3. Blizzard doesn't even host their own stupid patches. They rely on
peer-to-peer to do it for them.

4. The game itself costs $20 retail, and then to keep playing after
the trial period, you spend between $13 and $15 a month.

5. The game is online only, hence the cost in #4.

6. You need nine of the ten days just to download all the stupid
patches, so in reality, you only get one free trial day, because you
can't download anything until you have your trial account created AND
sign into the game.

7. As beautiful as the game seemed when I saw someone at work playing
it, I WILL NOT STAND FOR ANY OF THIS.

You know, this is the one weekend I had time to finally get into it
and now most of my weekend is gone, wasted, obliterated, by Blizzard
which as has turned into a worse company than Microsoft with all its
upgrades and patches because they just couldn't wait until things were
RIGHT before releasing the MAJORITY of the code WITH the game. Note:
THERE IS NO WARNING on the game itself stating that you'll need to
spend hours on a 5MB down DSL line getting stuff just to play the game
for the first time. The farthest I got was the trailer. From there,
it would not go further until I downloaded to the latest patch. The
line on the box that read "system requirements will change with time"
does not cut it with me. Yeah, they've covered their butts legally,
but that's all. They MUST have foreseen a gazillion downloads in the
future and to be truly legitimate, they should state on the box:
"Note that once you install this game, you will not be able to play
until you download all patches, which can be larger than the game
itself. We suggest you start this installation process well before
you actually want to play the game."

And, they should sell the patches on discs, too.

In this day and age of "everything is fast" - there is NO excuse for
this BS. Especially when expecting such amounts of money to slip
through their greedy little fingers. Thank goodness I never bought
this thing. I'm going to attempt to install it on my Mac which has
more hard disk space (windows was a partition on it and I never
expected to install anything THAT big) and if it fails again, I'm
going to boycott this elusive game like I did Radio Shack for years
when they cheated me on a keyboard.

~nv
"Java is the most distressing thing to hit computing since MS-DOS." –
Alan Kay

20090205

Garden beginning

Today I started the garden. 12 peat containers each of celery,
peppers, and brussel sprouts.

:)

Tomatoes will be started next time around, since they should be
planted when it's just a tad warmer outside so they can be
transplanted in the right amount of time TO the outside.

~nv

20090204

Windows: Remap keys

http://www.usnetizen.com/fix_capslock.php#figure1
Very handy for Asus where shift and up arrow REALLY should have been
swapped... This is what I typed into my little .reg file:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Keyboard Layout]
"Scancode Map"=hex:00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,03,00,00,00,36,00,48,e0,48,e0,36,00,\
00,00,00,00

:)

20090202

Rat rice?

The other day I gave my three rats a big huge spoonful of rice from
dinner. You know, like the soup ladle size spoon.

The next day I went to check on things and every last grain was gone.

Those little buggers probably shouldn't have eaten that much rice,
but, apparently they REALLY liked it. So far no ill effects,
thankfully. In fact all three of them are acting pretty spunky
tonight. The cats are sitting on the stairway landing giving me very
dirty looks, like, "I can't /believe/ you're letting them run around
your table and you won't let us have even ONE!! What a selfish human,
keeping three rats all to yourself like that!!"

My raternal instincts kicked into alertness when Lisa and Rikki both
fell silent and still, their eyes seemingly fixed on something. At
first I figured it was Sinclair, whom I didn't see in my line of
sight. Turns out I was right, sort of. I hadn't realized just how
close he was getting until something about the rats' stare made me
shiver. So I moved my elbow ever so slightly and peered over it to
see that Sinclair was just settling down below the edge of the table
with large black saucers for eyes. I didn't watch him very long to
know he was in pounce mode. Just as I pulled my hands together to
scare him off, his butt began wiggling and he'd already risen a bit on
his haunches. He flipped sideways and took off in high gear when he
realized I was not amused by nor proud of his intentions, no matter
how catlike and native those might be for him.

Anywho, time for bed. The little ratties have just been returned to
their big house for food, drink, and a nice clean bed. Dale said he
washed the sheets on our own bed so I guess WE get a nice clean bed,
too!! :D

Below: Rats when they were just two months old. They sure have grown
in their first year!