20070526

Long Trail Festival

Dudes!!! Like, I LOVE RapidWeaver!! It's the coolest thing since garlic nan!!

Anywho, I reworked the Long Trail Festival site. Some folks on the other side of the festival were apparently hoping to take over the site for me and run with it. I was happy to let them but I was fought for and kept on board as sole designer. So when she started sending me stuff to put up yesterday, I started feeling like maybe the site could use some sprucing up.

A few weeks ago, I'd obtained a copy of Rapid Weaver through a promotion Dale got me into. I think it was through MacZot, but with my memory these days... anywho, the program is for web design. I'd briefly tried out FrontPage and found it OK, but not fast enough. I'd rather code it all myself than use FrontPage unless I needed particularly special things like db links and such. Most recently I tried out iWeb and it made nice results, but just one little change, and it has to upload the whole site. That is a ROYAL pain in the butt, especially when you get up there with content. And everything is so controlled that it loads a bit slowly on some machines.

Rapid Weaver, however, has some pretty nice templates, uploads only UPDATED content, is easy to use, and supposedly you can customize your own templates somehow. That last is not so intuitive mind you but I'll figure it out eventually. I'm guessing it's made for the newbie designer and the more advanced stuff is found by advanced users, out of eyeshot of newbies so they don't inadvertently shoot themselves in the fingertip. I can respect that if that's the case and support it wholeheartedly. Still, I wish /I/ could find it within five minutes.

Me's thinkin' that I'll rework a few of my other sites, too, like Techie Tutorials for instance. Actually, that's the perfect site to do next because it's very run down and VERY much in need of repair. Unfortunately the design will be the easy part - it's the content I've got to rework, really. Hence the fact it's not done yet...

Anywho, there's my happiness for the day!!

20070521

Speed Reading

There is something called subvocalizing which many people do as they read. It entails "hearing" the words in your head. I am familiar with this because I do it occasionally as I write, and somewhat less so when I read. Dale thinks I read kinda fast already, and I'm sure I /used/ to. I could read a 300 page book in one night if I so chose. What happened, I wonder... LOL

Anywho, Dale sent me this neat article on how to speed read and why: http://zenhabits.net/2007/05/overclock-your-reading-speed/ I read through it and was on the sixth tip when he walked in. I started laughing because I realized I'd barely begun reading it and I was already through the whole article, and told him so. (In his email, he started out by saying, "Not that you need this, but...") Then Dale asked me, "But did you retain anything?" I immediately recalled something I'd not heard of before, a new word: saccades. It was toward the right side of the article, in blue, as if clicking on it would reveal a dictionary entry. I did not click it yet but intend to, as it's a new word. From context, I gathered it was something about little jumps of reading, perhaps chunks. I don't recall the six tips of speed reading to a T, but then, I wouldn't have if I had read it any slower, either. My brain retains whatever it feels like. [side note: I just looked up saccade. It's an eye movement which can last anywhere between 20 to 200 milliseconds. Now the sentence in which the word lived makes a bit more sense to me. Yay!]

Reading for me means information intake. When I read, I tend to form pictures or concepts in my head (actually, that was one of the tips - to visualize what you're reading, since the brain is largely geared towards recording visual input). These thoughts swirl around, reforming and reorganizing themselves until they settle into something a bit more concrete. Typically, when I'm truly engrossed in my reading material, I hear nothing at all in my head. One piece of the article did mention something about "losing interest" when one isn't reading quickly enough. I don't know if that's quite true, but it might be in some ways. If I'm not interested in something to begin with, it's difficult to immerse myself in its texts. So I tend to speed-read and skim through stuff. By doing this, I've discovered that I eventually run into a spot somewhere that I AM interested in, and this in turn makes me backtrack again and figure out how the text was able to lead up to what caught my attention. So, in this case, speed reading does help me retain interest (or rather, develop it). And, I retain FAR more information when I'm interested in it, so that in turn helps me learn new things.

On the other hand, I tend to read even faster when I'm learning or interested, because I "need" to know more - such as what happens in a novel, or how someone came up with a particularly neat theory, that sort of thing. You don't get that with speech. Speech is so much more limited! The stuttering, pauses, and idle conversation as thoughts proceed with the caution of an experienced dog sniffing a porcupine... with writing, all that has been done already, and whatever is uninteresting to the reader can be skipped. I love the written word for exactly this reason. It's more efficient in so many ways.

So, I finished the article and then noted that the authour, Kim Roach, loves productivity and has her own blog called The Optimized Life. Ooh!! This sounds like someone who might enjoy efficiency as much as I do!! It's so wonderful to find writers I truly enjoy reading. To combine this joy with a subject I'm interested in is a true rarity.

Anywho, I'm off to play with Photoshop now...

~nv

20070519

Ungh.

Aight, now that my camera's on the fritz, I've finally figured out that I can remove the little thingie on the tripod mount that has been driving me nuts and forcing the mount to keep unscrewing itself and going at an angle. You know the thing - it's a little metal thingie with another piece of metal screwed in in such a way to create a springy tension on the nubby thingie. Heh. That was technical. Anywho, when I screw the mount onto the bottom of the camera, it acts as - heck, I don't know what it's /supposed/ to do, but it pushes on the camera's body, effectively causing me to push against it more firmly as I screw it in. I was thinking this morning about how the threads in the camera are plastic, and began thinking, hm, maybe I shouldn't leave that thing screwed in... I could be wearing out my threads! But then it dawned on me: Why not remove the tension? Then it wouldn't keep unscrewing itself so much, right? And it would stop putting unnecessary pressure on the sides of the threads. One would think. Or maybe it's there for exactly that purpose.

At any rate, I've removed it, and am confident I can reapply if I deem necessary.

I wish I could fix my camera, however. It's out of warranty now, and just a month before our trip out west where I'm going to want to take more photos than ever before, the darned thing decides its batteries aren't charged enough. All five sets of them. Freshly charged. Oh, it'll work for a while, but after a short usage period (say, 10 minutes to a half hour), the indicator comes on saying the things are depleted. Changing batteries at that point is pointless. The best I can do is to keep using it until the camera *thinks* the batteries are completely dead, then wait one minute, turn it back on, and take one or two more shots or until it dies again. This is repeated until I leave it alone for a while, at which point the process starts up all over again.

The batteries are not depleted, I know that much, and I don't need statistical data to prove it to myself because I've been using this camera for over a year /very regularly/ I might add and I know how my camera usually behaves. So, here's my semi-scientific analysis of the problem: I KNOW my batteries last longer than this, not ALL my batteries would go bad at once because I bought them at different times, and if they WERE dead, they shouldn't work fine again an hour later. Some folks may not agree with this analysis, but they don't know my camera like I do, and they don't have a very strong interest in its behaviour like I do because they're not the ones with the problem.

That was a bit of a rant because Dale has asked me several times if I'm sure it's not the batteries. Bless him, he starts simple like a true troubleshooter should, but after the second doubt I get irritable. I know it's just my impatience and defensiveness glowing hotly through the hardened rock, but it's still reminiscent of when this drunken maintenance guy listened to my mom say that she put the five quarters into the machine, they went in fine, but the washer won't start. He bluntly wasted my mother's breath by asking, "Did you put quarters in?" Duh, the thing wouldn't have slid in if she hadn't, but that either means he didn't think that far ahead or he REALLY wasn't listening to a damned thing. But upon his drunken and lessened mental state, I digress: A little active listening would have been nice on his part.

Another rant: I typically enjoy being somewhat on the smart side. It allows me to be a bit lazy yet still retain knowledge. It's exciting to grasp ideas and figure things out on my own without having to ask someone else for lots of help. But. It. Has. Its. Downsides. For one thing, when I'm impatient or on thinking overtime (which usually translates to my being impatient), I have a LOT of trouble communicating and dealing with others. Especially others who are not on the same page as I am - i.e., unable to keep up with my thoughts, or on another tangent altogether, thus interrupting my flow of thinking. And, while I can admit that I can and do make lots of mistakes, it bothers me to no end when I'm trying to express my distaste for a problem that I am feeling unable to solve on my own, and hear basic troubleshooting that I have already considered and compensated for. I know it's all inside me, but dammit, I feel like the other person considers me stupid. (Note to self: I am aware I shouldn't and usually don't care much about what others think. Why does this bother me?) I know how "feeling stupid" is - I do it to people all the time in the field of computers. I understand it VERY well, in fact. So when my customers, especially those I know are somewhat computer-savvy, tell me of their troubles, I calmly say, "You have probably already tried this, but just so I know we're on the same page, would you do this?" Then I outline the basic steps they've done a million times already so I can absolutely rule out that they're technological nincompoops who are only SAYING they've tried everything. And I don't mean that in a particularly bad way, either, it's just fun to call people names. Especially when you have no clue what they actually do in their profession... see, I can imagine a nurse might think at some point in life, "I can not BELIEVE that girl just asked me that... egads, didn't she take health class when she was growing up?!" (No, actually, I wasn't actively listening apparently. I was probably staring at a hidden sheet of paper with lines of code on it because I was more interested in computers than where the groin is. See? We're not that different after all. We just have different interests.)

You know, I was just thinking about some of the "dumb things" I've heard people say. I suspect my reactions are not as subtle or reassuring as I think despite a firm belief that ignorance does not detract from a person's worth. I knew someone once who didn't know Boston, MA was on the ocean. Seriously. (For those of you going, "Huh? It is?" I suggest going to http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=boston,+ma&ie=UTF8&z=11&om=1 and checking it out yourself.) Now, I was not interested in history as a child, so my incredulous stare was due to the fact that even /I/ knew about the Boston Tea Party where they dumped tea into the harbour... which of course is directly attached to... ocean. Now, I figured at that point that while it's possible this guy didn't know harbours were attached to the ocean, after all this time he might have thought ahead to how ships from England got into a closed body of water in the first place and asked questions to find out what I finally explained to him in his late 20's. Savvy? Still, no biggie. Except, I was rather insensitive to this and vocalized my surprise at his ignorance, which he took to be my interpretation of his intellect (which it was not). He got rather defensive and quite abruptly ended the conversation by refusing to talk about Boston any more, regardless of its importance to our conversation. (Apparently of little importance, since I don't even remember what the conversation was originally about. I think it had to do with him driving a truck down there all the time years before, which also fueled my disbelief at his ignorance, I might add.)

You know what? I feel better now. I woke up feeling internalized. Meaning, withdrawn, irritable to some extent. I almost talked myself out of starting my day off badly; it's my day off and I didn't want to be a sourpuss all day long. So I thought about Dale and that led me to think about the trip. I started getting excited until I then thought about all the pictures we'll be taking, which then plummeted me into a horribly frustrated mood of angry insinuations toward Canon for creating a defective product. My problem is more likely not a defect but an unfortunate issue that occurs once in every hundred thousand cameras made, but I happen to be the unlucky consumer stuck with the problem so of course I'm taking it personally.

I think that I'm hormonal again, and anything that I can possibly construe as an irritation is going to become one until the hormones subside. (Sigh.)

Still, I'm now thinking of a few things I want to do today, and that's making me eager to put this blog to rest for the day: Shopping for luggage, fixing Dale's internet issue (Peaches chewed through his lifeline to the outside world), getting Indian Food. I also finally decided on which product I wanted to get Dale for his birthday. The decision was in the works for a couple of months and I fear I settled, but I wanted it ordered before it's too late.

Off I go, then, to find suitable clothing for today's adventures. And food. Yes, food would be good. Drinking less tea would probably be a good idea, too, since last time I got onto this bandwagon, my mood took a dive and almost cracked its neck... (internal child's voice: But I LIKE tea!!)

~nv

20070518

Mac-ity mac-ity

please come back-ity!

Uh, yeah, song in head. Anywho, last week I was talking to our
neighbours about petsitting and dude asked me, "Can you record from
tape to CD?" I thought it was a rhetorical question, you know, like,
"Is it possible to record from tape to CD" and I was like, "Yep." He
immediately hands me a tape.

Yeah. So, I just found said tape, and thought, "Oh boy, here we go
again, this is gonna take me like, half an hour to set up ... where's
my cable?" Fifteen minutes later, whilst talking to a friend on the
phone, I not only found my cable but also configured everything and
had it working to the point of hitting "record." In fact, I would
have had it recording /earlier/ than that, but I spent five or ten
minutes trying to figure out what was wrong because I had no sound in
my headphones. If I had done this just once before and really read
what I'd chosen about quality and buffering, I would have noticed
that if you record the way I'm recording, you don't get to hear
anything.

Macs are great, GarageBand is just unbelievably awesome - the mac
alone is worth close to what one pays for it; adding the apps to it
is exponentially worth every penny and then some. So, I'm just
waiting for this tape to finish up, then I'll meet my *husband* for
lunch and an AAA meeting about our trip out west. Fun, fun!! And
later I'll be headed to my friend's house so we can go fishing (me -
and her baby mind you - for the first time). YAY!

Lessee... anything else... I was in a bit of a funk all last week (or
two), but methinks I'm out of it. I realized I was in need of my
independence, and once I finally admitted that to myself, it's like I
felt I had the option and it just sorta melted away. I'm glad; it
sucked, being sad whilst happy. But now I appreciate happiness all
the more so it is all good. Could have been just the drop off of
getting married, too - I've heard lots of people go through that; I
didn't think I would because I had no big plans for the wedding,
nothing MAJOR to look forward to, therefore nothing MAJOR to drop off
from. I expected everything to pretty much stay the same afterward.
And it has. Still, marriage does have some implications I guess, and
maybe that's where the independence thing came from.

At any rate, it's passed. Speaking of things passing, I ran into an
acquaintance last night at work. I'd met this guy over two years ago
and took a liking to him (okay, so it was really more of a strong
interest). I was fighting off the concept of relationships but was
half-hoping he might ask me out. He never did, and now I'm glad of
it because it could have occurred just before I met Dale, and I may
not have started dating Dale at all - VERY scary thought, that.
Anywho, the guy still seems just as nice, but I realized that it was
almost as if I saw in him an element that I was ready to accept, and
Dale's got that element plus everything else I was hoping to find in
a lifelong partner. Kinda like a foreshadowing of what was about to
come into my life - a noble gentleman with that same type of calm,
delicate character that attracted me as I grew into who I am now.

And by delicate, I do mean that in a manly way. LOL.

Anywho, off to meet the man of my dreams now. We're gonna eat at
Burger King and do our trip thing and YAYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So awesome, he and I. *happy sigh*

~nv

20070515

English Class

I was chatting with someone at work yesterday about how I hated
English class. I didn't hate my teachers, just what they wanted me
to do: Become someone else. At least, that's how I saw it at the
time. Still do, although I'm less inclined to believe my strongest
convictions about that.

Well, somehow I'd graduated despite my distaste for duplicating
literary achievements. It was not due to hard work, however. My
whole education can be summarized thusly: Memorize books, Teacher's
pet, bookworm, enjoys learning, outcast from most social groups due
to personality and intelligence. I don't think I was one of those
snobby types who was always purposely showing off my brain, but I was
eager to demonstrate my understanding of a subject and converse with
those who harboured more knowledge than I - such as my teachers.
(They of course liked this, hence "Teacher's Pet.")

To this day I am uncertain as to exactly what I learned in English
Class. Beyond grammar, punctuation, and the proper formation of
sentences, alongside the introduction to writers I may not have known
about otherwise, what did I learn? That moulding myself into someone
I'm not is not my thang? What, then, of English majors? Are they
such hapless writers that they might actually have benefited from
being taught to write in others' styles? Did they not have their /
own/ style? Or did I miss the point entirely, and if so, why could
no one get through to me?

Curious, then, that the reason for this post is a notation to myself
that English Class taught me something both useful and detrimental.
It's something called "Complete Sentences." Most of my coworkers are
not particularly literary in their emails. This morning I was
reading email and saw a response to someone else. The writer simply
put: "it's done" - no punctuation, capitalization, etc. Wouldn't
surprise me if she'd even left out the apostrophy! I wrote to her
and said, "I need to take lessons from you on how to write shorter
emails." And as I wrote that, I could honestly not find any way
whatsoever to shorten that in a timely manner. Whatsoever.

I cannot imagine writing such an email. I am filled with horror at
the mere suggestion of it, even as I admire this person who can write
two quick words in response to what, for her, might be a month's
worth of writing. How I wish I could write simply when the need is
there!! My coworkers would love me!! Where my writing skills were
praised in high school, they are despised in the workforce.

Perhaps I missed my calling, then, after all.

I may never know.

~nv